HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35629 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Amiruddin Siddique, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Raavi Mishra, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for the respondent- bank. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus to command the respondent concerned to de-freeze the account of the petitioner being No.- 110238672813 maintained with Canara Bank. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the account has been freezed primarily on a complaint received from the Investigating Agency for there being doubtful transactions in his account. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to apply before the concerned respondent for de-freezing of the account and if he does so, the concerned respondent shall decide the same within a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in the light of the judgment of this Court in Ashish Rawat v. Union of India and 6 others, passed in Writ-C No. 1489 of 2026, decided on 08.04.2026. September 16, 2026 Atmesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amiruddin Siddique, Ankit Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Krishna Mohan Asthana (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Dushyant Kumar .....Petitioner(s) The Reserve Bank Of India Through Its Standing Counsel And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad