Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7340 (CAL)

RANA PRAMANIK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/384/2026 · 2026-04-08

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.04.2026 Court No.35. D/L.16. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 384 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Duttapukur Police Station case no. 55 of 2024 dated 16.01.2024 under Sections 376/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. And In the matter of : Rana Pramanik. ……Petitioner. Mr. Kajal Mukherjee Mr. Bikash Chakraborty Ms. Pallavi Mondal .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee Ms. Debadrita Mondal ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2024 and till date out of 25 witnesses 5 witnesses have been examined. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the Case Diary. I have taken into account the charge-sheet where out of 21 witnesses, 9 independent witnesses are there whose evidence may be vital for the prosecution. State is granted four months time to complete rest of the four witnesses. At this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court after the aforesaid four independent witnesses are over. 2 Accordingly, CRM (M) 384 of 2026 is dismissed. State is directed to communicate this order to the learned trial Court. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)