[2026:RJ-JP:21590] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7905/2026 Bhuralal Meena S/o Danmal, R/o Village Salavad, Police Station Ghatoli, District Jhalawar. At Present In Sub Jail, Sangod. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemang for Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 21/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner -Bhuralal Meena S/o Danmal, arrested in connection with FIR No.53/2026, dated 20.04.2026, Police Station Bapawar Kalan, District Kota Rural, for the offences under Sections 8/15 of N.D.P.S. Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged contraband recovered from the petitioner, namely doda chura weight as 41.680 kgs, is less than commercial quantity, whereas the prescribed commercial quantity for the same is 50 kgs. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents of any nature. Therefore, he prayed that the accused petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents as per the order passed by learned trial Court and the alleged contraband substance is less than commercial quantity as per the NDPS Act, and without commenting upon the merits or [2026:RJ-JP:21590] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7905/2026] demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused-petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Bhuralal Meena S/o Danmal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.53/2026, dated 20.04.2026, Police Station Bapawar Kalan, District Kota Rural, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse the liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 6. The petitioner shall also mark his presence before the concerned SHO of the Police Station twice a month for the entire period of the trial. The SHO shall maintain register to mark presence of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to appear twice in any month then, the same shall be considered as breach of this order and this bail shall stands canceled automatically without further reference to the Court. 7. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case of NDPS Act during pendency of the trial in this case, learned Public Prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of this bail, without any fail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J PAYAL DHAWAN/42