CONT P No. 927 of 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CONT P No. 927 of 2025 Mrs. G. Vimala, W/o. P. Thangaswamy, No. 13, 18th Street Padi - Pudunagar, Anna Nagar West, Chennai - 600 101. ..Petitioner(s) Vs A. Raja (President),All India Radio and Television, National Film Development Corporation Employees Cooperative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd., President,Television Center Annexe, Swamy Sivananda Salai, Chennai - 600 005. Now at. 56, Anugraha Apartment, F3, 1st Floor, Singanna Chetty Street, Chintradripet, Chennai - 600 002. ..Contemnor(s) To punish the Respondent herein for having disobeyed the order dated 20.09.2024 passed in W.A.No. 451 of 2023 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan, Senior Counsel for Mr.S. K. Adhavasneha For Contemnor(s): Mr.S.Dakshini Reddy for Mr.G.Murali ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present Contempt Petition has been instituted to punish the respondents for their willful disobeyance of the order of this Court dated 20.09.2024 in W.A.No.451 of 2023. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 927 of 2025 2 2. This Court, in the said appeal, has passed the following order: 12. For all the forgoing reasons, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. In view of the dismissal of the Writ Appeal, the appellant/Society shall pass appropriate orders to the effect that the first respondent herein had notionally retired from service on 29.02.2024 and thereby, disburse all her service and monetary benefits, along with all other attendant benefits, including her retirement/pensionary benefits, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent would submit that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. The appellant has been granted all benefits as per the directions issued by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the calculation of the benefits are erroneous. 5. If any differences in the benefits exists, it is for the petitioner to submit a representation to the competent authority to verify the correctness of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 927 of 2025 3 the calculation. This Court cannot adjudicate the correctness of the calculation in the contempt proceedings which is beyond the scope of the contempt petition. In any event, the respondents have not wilfully committed any contempt. Thus, this Contempt Petition stands closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 22-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VSI https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 927 of 2025 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J. VSI CONT P No. 927 of 2025 22-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 927 of 2025 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis