Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7338 (JHR)

RAJA ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2674/2026 · 2026-04-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:12475] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2674 of 2026 ------ Raja Ansari, aged about 36 years, Son of Dukhi Ansari, Resident of Village- Dandiyadih Bishanpur, P.O.- Pachamba, P.S.- Giridih Muffasil, District- Giridih (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Prakash, Advocate Mr. Kumar Nitesh, Advocate For the State : Md. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-28-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 89 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 976 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted Rs.20,000/- from the informant and fled away. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him on T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-03 of the supplementary affidavit, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.12.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 89 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 976 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 28.04.2026 Saroj/