[2026:RJ-JP:20195] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8481/2026 1. Pradeep Merotha S/o Latur Lal Merotha, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Bhatwasi, Jhalawar - 326038, Rajasthan. 2. Ashish Kumar Sharma S/o Awadhesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Amolak Nagar, Pali, Dausa - 321608, Rajasthan. 3. Deepak Saini S/o Ram Kishan Saini, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Dei, Tehsil Nainwan, Bundi - 323808, Rajasthan. 4. Pradeep Malav S/o Gauri Shanker Malav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Phoolbaroda, Tehsil Chhipabarod, Baran - 325219, Rajasthan. 5. Virendra Gochar S/o Durga Lal Gochar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o A-30, Laxman Vihar-I, Kunadi, Kota - 201002, Rajasthan. 6. Rachna D/o Subhash Chander, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Laxman Nagar, Dholasar, Jodhpur - 342308 Currently R/o 286, Vinoba Vihar, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur -302017, Rajasthan. 7. Suresh Gurjar S/o Shiv Dayal Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jhilai, Tonk - 304025, Rajasthan. 8. Meenakshi Meena D/o Kanhaiyaalal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Nohara Thok, Badolas, Sawai Madhopur - 322034, Rajasthan. 9. Priyanka Bairwa D/o Bajrang Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bohat, Baran - 325222, Rajasthan. 10. Archana Meena D/o Hargovind Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Thoomri, Dausa - 303506, Rajasthan. 11. Dalchand Mahavar S/o Chunni Lal Mahawar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Khand Gawdi, Civil Lines, Kota - 3240001, Rajasthan. 12. Suresh Kumar Saini S/o Jagdish Lal Saini, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Lawa, Tehsil Malpura, Tonk - 304504, Rajasthan. 13. Rashmi Kumari Meena D/o Ram Kishan Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 121, Nai Basti, Mundla, Talab Pada, Patna, Baran - 325218, Rajasthan. 14. Ajay Kumar S/o Lalchand, Aged About 31 Years, R/o [2026:RJ-JP:20195] (2 of 4) [CW-8481/2026] Golya Hedi, Kota - 325203, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Joint Secretary (Group-2), Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur -302005, Rajasthan. 3. The Director, Directorate Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Samta Nagar, Bikaner - 334001, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/05/2026 1. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that pursuant to advertisement dated 16.06.2022, the petitioners were appointed on the post of Physical Education Teachers vide order dated 31.05.2023 on probation of two years. It is stated that probation of two years has been completed by the petitioners in September, 2025, yet till this date confirmation order of the petitioners has not been issued nor have the petitioners received any order for any specific order for extension of probation period. 2. Learned counsel submits that on account of the fact that confirmation order has not been issued, the petitioners are being paid consolidated salary and the benefit of regular pay scale has not been extended to the petitioners till this date. [2026:RJ-JP:20195] (3 of 4) [CW-8481/2026] 3. Learned counsel further submits that only on account of the fact that certain complaints were received with regard to granting appointment to certain candidates on the basis of forged documents, on 14.08.2025 a Committee was constituted by the State Government for conducting an enquiry with regard to veracity of the documents of candidates appointed pursuant to advertisement dated 16.06.2022 and the Committee was required to submit its report within a period of 7 days. Although, more than 9 months have expired, the respondents have not taken any final decision with regard to confirmation of the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel submits that at no point of time doubt has been raised by the respondents over the qualification documents submitted by the petitioners for seeking appointment pursuant to aforesaid advertisement and only on account of fishing and roving enquiry made by the respondents against other employees, petitioners have been made to suffer. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 6. In the light of submissions made by the petitioners, it is clear that till date, the respondents have not taken any decision of either confirming the petitioners or to extend their probation period or to pass any other order in accordance with law, therefore, under these circumstances, this Court deems it just and proper to grant liberty to the petitioners to submit a representation before the Competent Authority, raising all their grievances, which shall be considered by the Competent Authority and a speaking order strictly in accordance with law shall be [2026:RJ-JP:20195] (4 of 4) [CW-8481/2026] passed within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. 7. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 9. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /35