1 2026:CGHC:17387 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3189 of 2026 1 - Anruddh Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Melau Ram Dewangan Aged About 53 Years (Aniruddh, Wrongly Mention) Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School Khaira (D), Block Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Public Instruction, Directorate Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The District Education Officer District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Avinash Singh, Govt. Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 16/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.04.21 12:56:13 +0530 2 “(i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct to the respondent No.04 to consider the case of the petitioner by deciding the pending representations and changing place of posting. (ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct to the respondents No.3 & 4 to follow the posting guidelines dated 07.02.2022 & 29.03.2023 issued by the res. No.1 & 2. (ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to disposed of this writ petition as per order passed in writ petition No.760/2026 order dated 23.01.2026. (iv) Any other relief/reliefs which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner while working as Assistant Teacher (LB), Khaira (D) Block Bilha was promoted to the post of Headmaster Primary School and posted at Govt. Primary School, Jondhra, Block – Masturi. He contended that the posting of the petitioner though made after counseling however, direction issued in this regard by the Director, Public Instruction dated 07.02.2022 has not been followed. Petitioner is also suffering with some medical ailment. He submitted a representation on 09.01.2025, however, no decision has been taken on his representation. He submits that in the facts of the case, direction be issued to the respondent No.4 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner. He also submits that petitioner may be permitted to submit fresh representation before respondent 3 No.4 and direction be issued to the concerned authority to consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted along with pending representation at the earliest within a specific time period. 3. Counsel for the respondent-State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. On due consideration of submission made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the respondent No.4 and in the event, if such representation is submitted, the concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the same in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of 2 months from the date of receipt of fresh representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi