Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7334 (GAU)

NABAJYOTI LAHAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/569/2026 · 2026-06-01

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010109642026 2026:GAU-AS:7656 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/569/2026 NABAJYOTI LAHAN S/O SRI JUGA LAHON, R/O JOYSAGAR COLLEGE CHARIALI, SIVASAGAR, DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2:SMTI DIPSIKHA GOGOI D/O LATE BINOD GOGOI R/O BORBHETA CHALIHA GAON DIST. JORHAT ASSAM 785004 ALSO AS TARUN RESIDENCY 3RD FLOOR BYE LANE NO 2 AJANTA PATH BELTOLA DIST. KAMRUP M GUWAHATI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R SENSUA, G KAUSHIK,R A LAHKAR,MS. D SARMAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 02.06.2026 Learned counsel, Mr. G. Kaushik is present for the applicant and learned counsel, Mr. D. Gogoi is present for respondent no.2 and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State is present. The applicant, namely, Nabajyoti Lahon has filed this application to correct some typographical error in the connected Criminal Petition No.429/2026. No objection has been raised from the respondent’s side. Thereby, the application for correction of the typographical error is allowed and where it has been typed as “under Section 68/89 BNS”, 2023, the same shall be typed and corrected as “under Section 69/89 BNS, 2023”. In terms of the above observation, the interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant