Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7333 (RAJ)

RAHUL TAK SON OF SHRI RAMGOPAL TAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8852/2026 · 2026-05-18

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:20930] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8852/2026 Rahul Tak Son of Shri Ramgopal Tak, Aged About 41 Years, Resident of Flat No. 301, Shiv Kripa Apartment, Arya Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Principal, Govt. Girls Senior Secondary School, Banipark, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Ojla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishal Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 18/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for last so many years, petitioner is facing criminal cases at the instance of wife and in-laws of the petitioner, who are resident of District Jalore. Learned counsel submits that vide impugned order dated 10.01.2026, the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Girls Senior Secondary School, Bani Park, Jaipur to Shreemati Shantidevi Champalal Andani Govt. Senior Secondary School, Surana Jalore. [2026:RJ-JP:20930] (2 of 2) [CW-8852/2026] 2. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner apprehends life threat on account of ongoing litigation with his in- laws and therefore, limited prayer of the petitioner is that in case, any transfer order is passed, transferring the petitioner in any of the District except District Jalore and Ajmer, petitioner would willingly join without raising any protest in any such transfer. 3. Such limited prayer has not been opposed by learned Additional Advocate General. 4. In view of above, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the petitioner to submit a representation in this regard within a period of seven days from today to the respondents expressing his willingness to join in any district except Jalore and Ajmer and on receiving such representation within the stipulated period, the respondents shall thereafter pass a fresh order within a period of seven days. 5. It is made clear that as per the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner, on behalf of the petitioner, in case, a fresh order is passed, transferring the petitioner in any district except Ajmer and Jalore, petitioner would not raise any protest in this regard and shall immediately join pursuant to such transfer order. 6. Till decision over such representation of the petitioner, operation of order dated 10.01.2026 shall remain stayed. 7. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /64