1 APHC010522612005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22432/2005 Between: 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM DISTRICT & ANOTHER, VIJAYAWADA-520 010 2. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER TELECOMMUNICATIONS,, NUZVID - 521 201 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. T MOHAN RAO ANOTHER, S/O. ANANDA RAO D.NO. 24-42/1, C/O. MEKALA RAMA RAO KONERUPET, NUZVID -521 201. 2. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Certiorari declaring the Award dt. 2-5-05 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour COurt, Hyderabad in LCID 47/04 as illegal, null and void and in consequence set aside the same to pass such other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 28742 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 suspend the operation of the Impugned Award dt. 2-5-05 in LCID 47/04 on the file of Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Hyderabad, Pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K ARUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P VIJAYA KUMARI 2. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Though the matter was adjourned on 31.07.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 07.08.2026 under the caption “for dismissal”. Today, when the matter is called, learned counsel for the petitioner has not appeared to argue the matter. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 14.08.2026 SSA 4 03 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22432/2005 14.08.2026 SSA