22-WP-586-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 586 OF 2026 Dilip Dinanath Bhoir .....Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent ..... Ms. Deepa Bhardwal (through VC), for the Petitioner. Mr. A.A.Palkar, A.P.P, for the Respondent-State. ..… CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, J. DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. The matter was called out in the morning session, the learned Counsel for the petitioner was not visible on VC. The matter was kept in the afternoon session. 2. Again in the afternoon session, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner though visible is not audible. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent points out that prayer clause (a) of the petition has worked out, inasmuch as, the learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Application No. 81 of 2025 has passed a common Wakodikar 1/2 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2026.09.09 18:15:55 +0530 22-WP-586-2026.doc order below Exhibit - 5 and Exhibit - 11 on 11th March, 2026. 3. In light of the order dated 11th March, 2026, nothing survives for further consideration in this petition, hence petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) Wakodikar 2/2