Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 73306 (MAD)

DHANANJAYAN v. GNANASEKARAN

SA/923/2015 · 2026-01-19

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SA No. 923 of 2015 __________ p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL SA No. 923 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015 Dhananjayan S/o. Subramani, Periyakadambur Village, Kasavarajapettai Post, Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallore Dist. ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. Gnanasekaran S/o. Jayaraman 2. J. Lakshmi W/o. Balaji. Both At Periyakadambur Village, Kasavarajapettai Post Firka, Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallore Dist. 3. S. Shanmugham S/o. Gopal, 4. Jayaraman S/o. Gopal. 5. Karthikeyan S/o. Gopal. 6. Valliammal W/o. Gopal. 3 To 6 Residing At Periyakadambur Village, Kasavarajapettai Post Firka, Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallore Dist. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 923 of 2015 __________ p. 2 7. Rani W/o. Govindaswamy, Nemili Village & Post Via Arungulam, Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallore Dist. 8. Janaki W/o. Balan, Periyar Nagar, Maddur Village & Post, Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallur Dist. 9. Boopalan S/o. Shanmugam 10.Thulasiraman S/o. Jayaraman 11.Chandrasekaran S/o. Jayaraman. 9 To 11 Residing At Periyakadambur Village, Kasavarajapettai Post Firka, Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallore Dist. 12.Gajenda Chetty Kasavarajapettai Village & Po, Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallore Dist. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. to set aside the Judgement and Decree passed in Appeal Suit in No.4 of 2013 dated 18.09.2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruttani confirming the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.no.40 of 2007 dated 23.12.2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruttani in so far as granting a preliminary decree and allotting of 1/6th share to defendants 5 and 6 each by allowing the Second Appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 923 of 2015 __________ p. 3 For Appellant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar for R7 and R8 No appearance for R1, R2, R5, R6 and R7 to R12 R3 and R4 died. JUDGMENT On earlier occasion, viz., on 09.12.2025, the learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo dated 09.12.2025 stating ‘no instructions’, therefore, this Court, directed the Registry to remove the name of the counsel for the appellant in the cause list and ordered to list the matter on 19.12.2025. On 19.12.2025, though the name of the appellant is printed in the cause list, the appellant failed to appear before this Court, therefore, this Court directed the Registry to post the matter 08.01.2026. 2. Again, on 08.01.2026 also, there is no representation for the appellant, hence the appeal was directed to be listed on 19.01.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, when the appeal is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellant, hence the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 19-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 923 of 2015 __________ p. 4 To 1. The Subordinate Judge, Tiruttani 2. The District Munsif Court, Tiruttani https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 923 of 2015 __________ p. 5 P.DHANABAL, J. ssd SA No. 923 of 2015 19-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis