[2026:RJ-JP:18932] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4478/2026 Pawan S/o Shri Bachhu Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Thenua, Police Station Sureer, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Chand Sharma Mr. SL Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 05/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.290/2024 registered at Police Station Kumher, District Deeg for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 452, 504, 302 of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and no recovery has been made from his conscious possession. He further submits that co-accused Kapil Sharma, Luvkush has been released on bail by the Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.09.2024 and co-accused Jitendra, Sadan have also got benefit of bail by Co-ordinate this Court vide order dated 09.09.2024, co-accused Sonveer has also got benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this [2026:RJ-JP:18932] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4478/2026] Court on 08.11.2024. Other co-accused Hariom released on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.05.2025 and co-accused Shriom also got benefit of regular bail by this Court on 30.06.2025. The case of the petitioner is on better footing. Therefore, on the ground of parity with the co-accused, the present petitioner is also entitled to the grant of bail. Petitioner is behind the bars since 16.02.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Pawan S/o Shri Bachhu Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/39