WASHIM AKRAM @ MD. WASIM AKRAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/629/2026 · 2026-03-31
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7320 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7320 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L135 31.03.2026 Bpg. dismissed C.R.M. (M) 629 of 2026
In Re: An application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Beldanga Police Station Case No.155 of 2025 dated 16.03.2025 under Sections 103(1)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023;
Washim Akram @ Md Wasim Akram Versus The State of West Bengal
Mr. Ahsan Alamgir Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon Ms. June Modak Ms. Munni Barman. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Bitashok Banerjee Mr. Soumadip Saha. …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 304 days and as charge-sheet has been submitted, further detention of the petitioner is not warranted, as such, the petitioner may be granted bail.
Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the deceased being brother of one of the accused was staying at the same house. The accused persons intended to portray that the deceased committed suicide. After post- mortem examination it only revealed that the same is homicidal as there was abdominal injuries as well as other ante mortem injuries. It has also been contended that one of the accused person is still absconding for which there is a delay.
Having considered the heinousness of the offence, at this
2 stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, CRM(M)629 of 2026 is dismissed.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)