Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7319 (PNJ)

MANJIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/2760/2026 · 2026-02-11

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH Sr. No.138 Manjit Singh State of Punjab an CORAM : HON HON Present : Mr. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL, 1. Lear satisfied if the pres Director, Departm on the representat petitioner. 2. Lear if the above prayer 3. Acco the writ petition is on the representat petitioner, by pass affected parties an date of receipt of a 4. Need petitioner and if th liberty to challenge 11.02.2026 Prince HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARY Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BA Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate for the petitioner r. Kuljit Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. * * * * * IBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner subm he present writ petition is disposed of wi partment of Rural Development & Pan sentations dated 24.09.2025 (Annexure Learned State counsel, who appears on prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without com ition is disposed of with a direction to re sentations dated 24.09.2025 (Annexure y passing a speaking order and after gran ties and in accordance with law, prefera pt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so d if the decision is not to the satisfaction allenge the same, in accordance with law Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / Whether reportable : Yes / ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2760-2026 Date of decision: 11.02.2026 …. Petitioner ..... Respondent AK SIBAL A BANERJI titioner. . r submits that at this stage, he would be of with a direction to respondent No.2 & Panchayat, Mohali to take a decision nexures P-6 and P-7) submitted by the ars on advance notice, has no objection ut commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.2 to take a decision exures P-6 and P-7), submitted by the granting opportunity of hearing to all preferably within two months from the ion so taken be communicated to the faction of the petitioner, he would be at ith law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No 2026 dents uld be 2- on the ection case, cision the to all m the to the be at PRINCE SAINI 2026.02.13 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document