SAYAR SINGH S/O SARJEET SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5953/2026 · 2026-05-06
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7316 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7316 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:19119] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5953/2026 Sayar Singh S/o Sarjeet Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sanwalpur Police Station Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar (Presently In Judicial Custody At District Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Non-petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anish Bhadala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 06/05/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 11/2026 registered at Police Station Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3) & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 in which charge- sheet has been filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3), 3(5) & 308(3) of B.N.S., 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2026; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore,
[2026:RJ-JP:19119] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5953/2026] prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2026; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sayar Singh S/o Sarjeet Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
[2026:RJ-JP:19119] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5953/2026]
7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/34