Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7316 (PNJ)

RAJEEV KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/17487/2026 · 2026-05-04

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.17487 of 2026 Date of decision: 04.05.2026 Rajeev Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Ishank Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. This is a petition moved under Section 528 of BNSS praying for direction to consider and act upon the complaint/representation dated 12.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) submitted by the petitioner to respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 12.01.2026 (Annexure P-1), within a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5. Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2- Director General of Police, Haryana, is directed to look into the NEETU RANI 2026.05.04 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD CRM-M No.17487 of 2026 -2- representation dated 12.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 7. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 04.05.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.05.04 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD