Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7312 (AP)

Bora Durga Reddy, S/o. Appanna, v. The Andhra Pradesh Electricity Power Distribution

WP/18639/2015 · 2026-08-04

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010561202015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 18639 OF 2015 Between: 1. Bora Durga Reddy, S/o. Appanna,, Aged about 61 years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No. 38-40-1, 104 Area, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam District - 530008 ...Petitioner AND 1. The Andhra Pradesh Electricity Power Distribution, Corporation Limited (APEPDCL), Visahapatnam, Rep. by Chairman-cum-Managing Director 2. The Assistant Divisional Engineer Andhra Pradesh, Electricity Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Marripalem, Visahapatnam 3. The Assistant Engineer, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Marripalem, Visahapatnam 4. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by its Commissioner 5. Bora Ramachandra Reddy S/o Thatha Rao, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No. 38-40-43, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in not disconnecting the Electricity Power Connection No. 000169 situated at Door No. 38-40-43, Ward No.41, 104 Area, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and pass such other or further order or orders as are deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 24091 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to disconnect the Electricity Power Connection No. 000169 situated at Door No. 38-40-43, Ward No.41, 104 Area, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam forthwith pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such other or further order or orders as are deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 102375 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 5 OF 2015(WPMP 122453 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: K SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:K SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:18639 OF 2015 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 05.08.2026 BSP/TPS 4 17 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 18639 OF 2015 05.08.2026 BSP/TPS