Tamilselvan v. State Rep.by The Inspector of Police
/4838/2026 · 2026-02-26
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 73098 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 73098 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 4838 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 4838 of 2026 1.Tamilselvan S/o,Kannaiyan, No.4/141,Rasa Koyil Street, Oruvandur, Namakkal District-637015. 2.Kaviyarasu S/o,Murugesan, No.4/16,Moopa Street, Oruvandur, Namakkal District-637015 ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Mohanur Police Station, Namakkal District. (Crime No.44 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.44 of 2026 Pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police, and thus render Justice. For Petitioner(s): T Dhasarathan For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 4838 of 2026 ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2) and 351(3) of BNS in Crime No. 44 of 2026, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioners is that they suspected the de facto complainant of passing on information regarding illegal sand theft. On such suspicion, the petitioners allegedly attacked the defacto complainant with stones, causing grievous injuries. Based on the occurrence, the present case has been registered.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioners are willing to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail for the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterates the prosecution case, stating that both petitioners have bad antecedents. The first petitioner has three previous cases, and the second petitioner has six previous cases. She opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 4838 of 2026
5. Though the injured has been discharged from the hospital, considering the petitioners' bad antecedents and the motive behind the occurrence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 26-02-2026 MPA To 1.State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Mohanur Police Station, Namakkal District. (Crime No.44 of 2026) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 4838 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR, J. MPA CRL OP No. 4838 of 2026 26-02-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis