Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7306 (JHR)

MUKESH RAM ALIAS AZAD ALIAS RAVI ALIAS KULLU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3429/2026 · 2026-04-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:12231] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3429 of 2026 ------ Mukesh Ram @ Azad @ Ravi @ Kullu, aged about 28 years, son of Late Nanhaku Ram, resident of village Purni Palheya, P.O. Palheya, P.S. Manika, District- Latehar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 272 of 2023 arising out of Chhipadohar P.S. Case No. 04 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 of the I.P.C. and Section 25(1-B)(1-A), 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being a member of extremist J.J.M.P. organization attempted to kill the police personnel by firing upon them and deterred them from discharging their duties. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Gaju Bhuiyan. It is further submitted that some of the co-accused persons including Gaju Bhuiyan have been granted bail vide order dated 19.09.2019 in B.A. No. 7246 of 2019, order dated 21.10.2019 in B.A. No. 8995 of 2019, order dated 09.07.2020 in B.A. No. 3825 of 2020, order dated 27.11.2025 in B.A. No. 10276 of 2025, order dated 15.05.2024 in B.A. No. 1755 of 2024. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.10.2025 as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Latehar in connection with S.T. Case No. 272 of 2023 arising out of Chhipadohar P.S. Case No. 04 of 2019 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24/04/2026 Amar/