Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7305 (ALL)

UDAY NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/9687/2026 · 2026-09-16

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9687 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. The learned A.G.A. has pointed out that the applicant has a criminal history of one other case being Case Crime No.459 of 2008, under Sections 332, 353, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kathaund, District Jalaun, which has not been explained. The declaration made on affidavit is that the applicant has no criminal history. 2. On being confronted with this fact, Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with the liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application after disclosing the complete criminal antecedents of the applicant, as required under Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the above mentioned liberty. 4. Office is directed to return the certified copy, if any, filed along with the bail application to the counsel for the applicant. September 17, 2026 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Uday Narayan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad