Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7301 (GAU)

RUPESH GOEL @ RUPESH KR. GOEL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Crl.Pet./784/2026 · 2026-06-03

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010104812026 2026:GAU-AS:7757 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./784/2026 RUPESH GOEL @ RUPESH KR. GOEL SON OF RAMESH GOEL, RESIDENT OF - SUBHAM PAKVIEW, F.A. ROAD, GUWAHATI, P.S. - FATASIL AMBARI, DISTRICT - KAMRUP (METRO), PIN - 781009 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM, 2:SNEHA GOEL D/O SHRI BAJRANG AGARWAL EX-W/O RAKESH GOEL RESIDENT OF - RAJAT SHANTI PLAZA FLAT NO. 3A KUMARPARA PANCHALI P.S. - BHARALAMUKH GUWAHATI ASSAM DISTRICT - KAMRUP (METRO) PIN - 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR Z ALAM, R ISLAM,MS. S NAZNEEN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 04.06.2026 1. Heard Ms. S. Nazneen, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam and Mr. R. Dey, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 2. This is an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying for quashing the proceedings of Bharalamukh P.S. Case No.569/2021. 3. The petitioner, Rupesh Goel @ Rupesh Kr. Goel is the brother-in-law of the respondent No.2. It may be mentioned that the respondent No.2 is having dispute with her husband. 4. On 06.07.2021, she lodged a complaint before Police stating that she was given permission to stay in her matrimonial house by an order of the Court and on that day, the present petitioner being her brother-in-law came to her house and misbehaved with her. 5. Today, Mr. Dey, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that both parties have already setelled their disputes and the respondent No.2 is not interested to proceed further in this matter against her brother-in-law. Page No.# 3/3 6. Considering all these facts, the prayer is allowed. 7. The criminal proceedings of Bharalamukh P.S. Case No.569/2021 are quashed and set aside. 8. With the aforesaid direction, this criminal petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant