HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9237 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicants, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No.111 of 2026, under Sections 110, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) BNS, Police Station- Chandausi, District Sambhal, with a prayer to enlarge them on anticipatory bail as the applicants apprehend their arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants has contended that although the applicants have been named in the FIR, only a general role has been assigned to them. The two injured persons have received two injuries each, and none of the injuries has been opined to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. 4. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail, but could not point out any injury which may be considered to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. Learned counsel for the informant has argued that a 14-year-old child has also been hurt in the assault made by the applicants. The injury is on a vital part of the body, and it is only due to a stroke of luck that the injured did not sustain any further grievous injury. 5. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saif Ullah, Sudhakar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Farman And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Both the injured have received simple injuries. The incident, as described by the injured witnesses, is that applicant Farman had an altercation with the injured while he was coming from near a marriage hall. It is the applicant, Farman, who thereafter called the other accused, who allegedly assaulted the injured using kicks, fists and sticks. 7. The mode and manner of assault, as described in the FIR and the statements of the witnesses, as well as the nature and number of injuries sustained by the injured, in the prima facie opinion of the Court, do not rule out the possibility of false implication of the applicants due to previous enmity. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. 8. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicants on anticipatory bail. 9. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicants is allowed. 10. In the event of the arrest of the applicants Farman and Asik, they shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicants shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; NABAIL No. 9237 of 2026 2 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 12. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 16, 2026 S.A. NABAIL No. 9237 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad