RAM SWAROOP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/40284/2014 · 2026-09-14
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 40284 of 2014
Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Case is called out. None appears for the petitioner(s). Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present. Record goes to show that the case is listed in the category of oldest pending cases in the cause list, for priority hearing. A notice is also placed in the cause list mentioning that "old cases up to the year 2022 shall be taken up in the first round itself. In case of non- appearance, matter shall be dismissed as infructuous or otherwise, and in the cases, where the cause of action still survives, the concerned advocates are expected to mark them accordingly in the cause list. Failure to do so, may result in its dismissal as infructuous" but, neither the counsel for the petitioner(s) has appeared nor has the case been marked to indicate that the cause of action still survives. A notice in this regard has also been affixed on the notice board. This matter is pending since the year 2014. It appears that either the petitioner(s) has/have lost interest in pursuing the matter or it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Needless to say that the petitioner(s) shall be at liberty to file recall/restoration application in case any cause of action still survives. September 15, 2026 Jitendra/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.K. Upadhyay, V.K. Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., R.C. Singh (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Ram Swaroop .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad