Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7297 (KAR)

K K PRAKASH v. K K RAVI @ K K RAVINDRA

WP/10515/2022 · 2026-02-06

Tara Vitasta Ganju

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6976 WP No. 10515 of 2022 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 10515 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. K K PRAKASH AGE 46 YEARS S/O LATE KEMPAIAH THOLUSHETTAHALLI VILLAGE SHANTHALLI HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT 2. SMT BEENA AGE 40 YEARS W/O K K PRAKASH THOLUSHETTAHALLI VILLAGE SHANTHALLI HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M E NAGESH., ADVOCATE) AND: K K RAVI @ K K RAVINDRA AGE 51 YEARS S/O LATE KEMPAIAH AGRICULTURIST THOLUSHETTAHALLI VILLAGE SHANTHALLI HOBLI HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6976 WP No. 10515 of 2022 - 2 - SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT PRESENT RESIDING AT GUDUGALALE VILLAGE KODLIPET HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT- 571235 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SANCHAN JAI NANDAN., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMWARPET IN O.S.NO.25/2019 DTD.10.3.2021 AS PER ANNEXUER-E AND THAT OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEANED SR CIVIL JUDGE SOMWARPET, KODAGU DISTRICT IN MA NO.7/2021 DTD 21.12.2021 AS PER ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, he restricts his prayer in the present petition to a direction to the Trial Court for expeditious hearing of the matter. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6976 WP No. 10515 of 2022 - 3 - 2. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same. However, he submits that, in any event, the matter is at the stage of cross examination of the defendants' witness. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that they will not take any unnecessary adjournments before the Trial Court. The parties are bound down by the statement made by their counsel. 4. The petition is disposed of in the aforegoing terms. 5. It is clarified that this Court has not examined the matter on merits. Both parties are at liberty to raise all contentions before the learned Trial Court. All pending applications stand closed. (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE HR/BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA