Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7297 (GAU)

SRI ASHAD ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1102/2026 · 2026-06-03

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010103902026 2026:GAU-AS:7791 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1102/2026 SRI ASHAD ALI S/O SAMAN ALI, R/O VILL BHUMKI PT. 1, P.S. SALAKATI, DIST KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN 783369. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS K TAYE, MS D DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 04.06.2026 Heard Ms. D. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner, namely, Ashad Ali, has filed this application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, with prayer for pre-arrest bail, as he is apprehending arrest, in connection with Kokrajhar P.S. Case No. 65/2026, registered under Sections 336(3)/318(4)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. It is submitted that case diary has been received and there are incriminating materials in the case diary against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection. 5. The allegation against the petitioner, basically, is that he has been issuing duplicate challans, which, however has been denied by the petitioner. 6. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised objection and stated that the co-accused are yet to be arrested and the investigation may be adversely affected if the petitioner is insulated by an order of anticipatory bail. 7. Indeed, there are incriminating materials in the case diary but it appears that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required, as the investigation has progressed to a certain extent. 8. It appears that anticipatory bail may be granted to the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 9. Meanwhile, in the event of his arrest, the above-named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority, under the conditions that:- i) the petitioner shall appear before the I.O within 1(one) week and cooperate with the investigation; ii) the petitioner shall appear before the I.O on every fortnight, till completion of the investigation; iii) the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged; iv) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission; 10. On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled. 11. Send back the case diary. 12. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant