Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12130 WP No. 60 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
SRI UGRAPPA P N S/O LATE NARASIAH AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS NO.77, 8TH MAIN, J B KAVAL 4TH BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 096 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.UGRAPPA N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER THE BANGALORE CITY CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.3, 1ST FLOOR, PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD CHAMRAJPET BENGALURU - 560 018 … RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILEDUDNER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRESIDING OFFICER,DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1 KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU,DATED 22.10.2021 MADE IN SA.NO.219 OF 2020 AND CONSEQUENTLY PERMIT THE APPELLANT TO REDEEM THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12130 WP No. 60 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
1. This writ petition is filed on 23.12.2021. The office has raised certain office objections on the petition to be complied with by the petitioner.
2. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, the petitioner has neither complied with the office objections nor is present before the Court today. It seems the petitioner is not interested in complying with the office objections and prosecuting the petition.
3. As the petition is of the year 2022, I do not find any grounds to adjourn the matter further.
4. In this view of the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1