Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 72907 (MAD)

K.M.Sivaprakasam v. K.K.Maruthamuthu Padayachi (Died) 1. K.M. Thangaraju

CRP/928/2026 · 2026-02-23

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.R.P.No.928 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 23.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI C.R.P.No.928 of 2026 and CMP.No.4937 of 2026 K.M.Sivaprakasam ... Petitioner Vs. K.K.Maruthamuthu Padyachi (Died) 1. K.M.Thangaraju 2. K.M.Manickam 3. K.M.Natarajan 4. K.M.Venkatachalam (Died) 4. Panchalai 5. Annapoorani 6. Vasanth @ Rajeshkumar (impleaded legal heirs of deceased Venkatachalam) respondents are sons and daughter of S/o.K.K.Maruthamuthu Padayachi ... Respondents Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC., to allow the civil revision petition and issue appropriate directions to the Subordinate Court, Attur, to dispose of I.A.No.231 of 2019 in O.S.No.486 of 1985 by passing a final decree for partition and allotment of the petitioner’s share. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.928 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.RA.Gopinath O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 2. The third defendant in the suit for partition is the revision petitioner. Subsequent to the preliminary decree passed as early as on 03.08.1989 in O.S.No.486 of 1985, the petitioner filed a final decree application in I.A.No.231 of 2019 before the Subordinate Court, Attur. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite passage of more than six years, the final decree application has not seen light of the day. The learned counsel for the petitioner would take me through the adjudication in the A-Diary, which is also enclosed in the typed set of papers, I find that on account of some interlocutory applications or the other, the matter is being adjourned, despite the Advocate Commissioner has also having filed a report even in July 2023. 4. Considering the limited relief sought in the revision, notice to the respondents is being dispensed with. This Civil Revision Petition is 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.928 of 2026 allowed directing the learned Sub Judge, Attur shall dispose of all pending Interlocutory Applications within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, the final decree application in I.A.No.231 of 2019 within a period of eight weeks. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 23.02.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking Order kv To The Subordinate Court, Attur. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.928 of 2026 P.B.BALAJI, J. kv C.R.P.No.928 of 2026 23.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis