Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-8858-20 IN THE H
HARSH @ RISH STATE OF PUNJ 1 The dat 2 The dat 3 The dat website 4 Whethe pronoun pronoun 5 The del judgme CORAM: HON Present:
Mr. Ms. S Mr. H **** MANISHA BATR
1. The Section 483 of Bh for grant of regul registered under S Cantonment, Distr 2026 (O&M)
1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH
RISHU @ HARSH GILL
Versus PUNJAB
date when the judgment is reserved he date when the judgment is pronoun he date when the judgment is uploaded ebsite hether only operative part of the judg ronounced or whether the full judgmen ronounced he delay, if any, of the pronouncement dgment and reasons thereof. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS r. Nitin Narula, Advocate for the pe Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab Mr. Hanspuneet Singh Kehal, Advoca **** BATRA, J. The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh regular bail in case arising out of F nder Sections 323, 326, 341, 148 and t, District Amritsar. JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-8858-2026 (O&M)
... Petitioner
...Respondent served 28.04.2026 onounced 29.04.2026 loaded on the 29.04.2026 e judgment is dgment is Full cement of full Not applicable ANISHA BATRA the petitioner dvocate for the complainant preferred by the petitioner under Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) t of FIR No.0123 dated 20.07.2020 48 and 149 of IPC at Police Station
oner dent nder SS”) 2020 ation AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.29 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-8858-20
2. The a recorded by the co working at his sho motorbike in front there but Jatinde meanwhile parent hurling abuses to co-accused also re clamour being ra accused caused in beatings to his br taken to the hospit
3. After The victim had su Jatinder @ Lucky benefit of interim Investigation now trial. Proceedings he was declared as custody since then
4. It is a custody for a peri time to conclude a 2026 (O&M)
2 The aforementioned FIR was registe the complainant Paramjit Singh allegi his shop when Jatinder Singh @ Lucky n front of his shop. The complainant t atinder Singh @ Lucky started mis parents of Jatinder Singh @ Lucky a ses to the complainant. Then the pe also reached there and opened an assa ing raised, his brother Parminder Si sed injuries to him with their respecti his brother.
They also threw brick hospital and was provided treatment. After registration of FIR, investigatio had suffered one grievous and two Lucky was arrested on 16.02.2021. terim bail on 01.07.2021 which was n now stands concluded. The petition edings for declaring him as a proclaim ared as such on 10.10.2025. He was ar e then. It is argued by learned counsel for the a period of over six months now. T lude as none out of 30 prosecution w
registered on the basis of statement alleging that on 29.06.2020, he was Lucky reached there and parked his inant told him not to park his vehicle d misbehaving with him. In the ucky also reached there and started the petitioner accompanied with the n assault upon the complainant. On der Singh had reached there. The spective weapons and also extended brick-bats inside his shop. He was ent. stigation proceedings were initiated. two simple injuries. The accused
2021. The petitioner was extended h was made absolute on 13.07.2021. etitioner absented himself during the roclaimed person were initiated and was arrested on 18.10.2025 and is in for the petitioner that he has been in w. The trial will take considerable tion witnesses has been examined so
ment was d his hicle the arted h the . On The nded was ated. used nded
021. g the and is in en in rable ed so AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.29 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-8858-20 far. His further d abide by the term that he deserves to
5. Per co complainant has proclaimed person benefit of bail. A is, therefore, stress
6. This C for the parties at co
7. The unlawful assembly grievous injuries t bail at the first i custody since 18.1 future are bleak. T custody, the natur attendant facts and has made out a cas the petitioner is or as well as two sure Trial Court/Chief J 2026 (O&M)
3 rther detention would not serve any u e terms and conditions to be imposed rves to be released on bail.
Per contra, learned State counsel assi t has vehemently argued that the pe person. There are chances of his a ail. Allegations against him are even , stressed that the petition does not des This Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. The petitioner is alleged to have sembly with the co-accused and to juries to the victim. He had been ex first instance, however, he had abse ce 18.10.2025. The chances of conc leak. Taking into consideration the pe nature of the allegations as levelled cts and circumstances, this Court is of t a case for release on bail. According is ordered to be released on bail sub surety bonds of each like amount Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magist
any useful purpose. He is ready to posed upon him. It is thus, argued el assisted by learned counsel for the the petitioner had been declared a his absconding again, if extended even otherwise serious in nature. It ot deserve to be allowed. ubmissions made by learned counsel have formed membership of an to have caused simple as well as een extended benefit of anticipatory d absented himself. Now he is in f conclusion of the trial in the near the period spent by the petitioner in velled against the petitioner and the t is of the considered opinion that he cordingly, the petition is allowed and ail subject to his furnishing personal ount to the satisfaction of the learned agistrate concerned. dy to gued r the ed a nded e. It unsel f an ll as atory is in near er in d the at he and sonal rned AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.29 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-8858-20
8. It is m the purpose of dec on the merits of th
9. In the petitioner, it shall application seekin
10.
Since any, is rendered in 29.04.2026 Amit Sharma
2026 (O&M)
4 It is made clear that any observation of deciding the present petition and t s of the case. In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent-State seeking cancellation of bail. Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MAN
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No
vation made herein above is only for d the same shall have no bearing y FIR/complaint lodged against the State to seek redressal by filing an allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Yes/No
for aring t the g an n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.29 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.