Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 729 (UTT)

RESHAB SARKAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/61/2025 · 2026-03-12

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1652 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR No. 61 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Shubham Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. with Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. A.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent. 4. Pursuant to the previous order both the parties are present in court and after interaction with both of them it appears that both the parties does not want to live together though both of them married on 24.04.2023. 5. In such view of the matter, since both the parties are not intended to live together there is no option for them except to get the divorce by way of mutual consent. 6. In such view of the matter, the liberty is granted to both the parties to seek divorce by way of mutual consent by moving an appropriate application before the Family Court within 15 days from today and if such an application is moved for seeking divorce by way of mutual consent the concerned Family Court immediately proceed with the matter and expedite the matter. So far as the Stree Dhan and other articles are concerned, both the parties can adduce their evidence before the Family Court. 7. The husband, who is present in court, submits that he is ready to pay a sum of Rupees Seven Lakhs towards the permanent alimony, which the respondent-wife agreed. 8. In such view of the matter, since both the parties have settled the amount of Rupees Seven Lakhs towards permanent alimony, the Family Court shall take all these aspects and then expedite the matter. The husband is directed to pay Rupees Two Lakhs on the date of presentation of the divorce petition and the remaining amount he will pay on the date when the Family Court 2026:UHC:1652 decide the issue finally. 9. In view of the aforesaid observations and directions as above, the instant criminal revision is disposed of finally. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 12.03.2026 PR