Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7289 (UTT)

AMAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/400/2026 · 2026-06-12

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010039542026 MCRC 2/2026 In BA1/400/2026 Aman --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Shivam Gulati, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The modification application has been moved for modifying the order dated 12.06.2026. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that instead of section 137(2) of BNS the correct sections 137(2), 64(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3(a)/4 of POCSO Act has to be inserted. 5. Modification application is allowed. 6. The order dated 12.06.2026 be corrected accordingly. 7. This order be treated as part of the order dated 12.06.2026. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 19.06.2026 PR