Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 72876 (MAD)

C.R.Velumani v. C.Vijay Sai Prakash and 2 others

A/899/2026 · 2026-02-20

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 899 of 2026 in CS DR. No.30487 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 899 of 2026 IN CS DR NO. 30487 OF 2026 1. C.R.Velumani S/o.Mr.Ramasamy, Door No.2/14, Srinivasa Nagar Main Road, Near Sivan Kovil, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107. Now Temporarily residing at No.5/77, 6th Street, Abirami Nagar, Madhuravoyal, Chennai 600 095. Applicant(s) Vs 1. C.Vijay Sai Prakash and 2 others S/o.Chandrasekar, Residing at Flat No.2, Sri Sri Sri Shankara Flats, VOC Street, Rajakilpakkam, Selaiyur, Chennai 600 073. 2.M.Ganesh Prabhu S/o.Muthusamy, Door No.180, 3rd Main Road, Engineers Avenue, S.Kolathur, Keelkattalai, Chennai 600 117. 3.Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Rep.by its Signatory/ Authorised Officer, Having Branch Office at 1st Floor, Ceebros Center, No.39, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 899 of 2026 in CS DR. No.30487 of 2026 MOntieth Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. Respondent(s) CS SR No. 30487 of 2026 1. C.R.Velumani Plaintiff(s) Vs 1. C.Vijay Sai Prakash Defendant(s) A No. 899 of 2026 For Applicant(s): B.Devagi Thangavel B.Devagi Thangavel-MS/1181/2002 M.Lokesh V.Vanmathi M.Anitha For Respondent: ORDER This application has been filed by the applicant/plaintiff seeking to sue the respondents 1 & 2 / defendants 1 & 2 in the suit. 2. According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main suit and filed the suit for the relief of declaration. The suit property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court. The respondents 1 & 2 are residing https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 899 of 2026 in CS DR. No.30487 of 2026 outside the jurisdiction of this Court, and a substantial part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court and the suit can be instituted before this Court. 3. This Court heard petitioner side and perused the records. 4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit that the suit property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and the respondents 1 & 2 are residing outside the jurisdiction of this Court, substantial part of cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court and the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to allow this application and therefore, leave is granted as prayed for. 5. The Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter for admission on 23.02.2026. 20.02.2026 mtl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 899 of 2026 in CS DR. No.30487 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J., mtl A No. 899 of 2026 IN CS DR NO. 30487 OF 2026 20.02.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis