[2026:RJ-JP:21389] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5010/2026 Rahul Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sharan Ki Dhani Village Gajdharapura District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP Mr. Deepak Chauhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 20/05/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 62/2026 registered at Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 109(1), 126(2), 324(4), 189(2) and 352 of BNS and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the recovery of fire arm was effected from other co- accused. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, therefore, anticipatory bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:21389] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5010/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. It is contended that the main allegation of assaulting the complainant and using fire arm are against present petitioner. It is alleged in the FIR that present petitioner alongwith the other co-accused opened fire on the complainant on 14.03.2026. It is also contended that against present petitioner one more criminal case was registered pertaining to various offences, prima facie petitioner's involvement is apparent from the statement of the witnesses, therefore considering the aforesaid facts, the anticipatory bail application deserves dismissal. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. In the FIR direct allegations against the petitioner and other co-accused. It is alleged against the petitioner that he alongwith the other co-accused attacked complainant and also open fire at complainant. Petitioner is found to be involved in one more criminal case, therefore this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. bail application is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu/73