Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 72804 (MAD)

Vikram Devendran v. Annamalai

CRL OP/4797/2026 · 2026-02-26

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 4797 of 2026 Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP No. 4797 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.3447 of 2026 Vikram Devendran ..Petitioner Vs Annamalai ..Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to set aside the order passed in M.P.No.6 of 2025, dated 22.01.2026 in S.T.C.No.707 of 2023, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Villupuram. For Petitioner : Ms.G.Gayathri ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the order passed in M.P.No.6 of 2025, dated 22.01.2026 in S.T.C.No.707 of 2023, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Villupuram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 4797 of 2026 Page2 of 4 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has filed a petition under Section 311 Cr..P.C. to recall P.W-1/complainant for the purpose of filing counter statement. She further submitted that the petitioner has not cross-examined P.W-1. The trial Court finding that recall of P.W-1 is not necessary for filing a counter statement, had dismissed the petition. Thereagainst, the present petition has been filed. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 4. The prayer of the petitioner in M.P.No.6 of 2025 is extracted as under: "For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to recall the respondent/complainant side evidence, reverse the petition in S.T.C.No.707 of 2023 for the purpose of filing counter statement on the side of the petitioner/accused, in the cases and pass such other orders as this Court may deem fit in the interest of justice". 5. Considering the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner and also considering the finding of the trial Judge that P.W-1 cannot be recalled for the purpose of filing counter statement on the side of the petitioner/accused, this https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 4797 of 2026 Page3 of 4 Court is of the opinion that the trial Judge has rightly dismissed the application and there is no infirmity or error in the order passed by the trial Judge. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SRM To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Villupuram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 4797 of 2026 Page4 of 4 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. SRM CRL OP No. 4797 of 2026 26-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis