ALI MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (REVENUE)
WP(C)/664/2026 · 2026-04-15
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 728 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 728 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 7 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 664/2026 Ali Mohammad and Anr. …Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. UT of JK and Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 15.04.2026
01. The record reveals that adjournments have been sought on the last two consecutive dates of hearings by the learned proxy counsel on behalf of learned arguing counsel representing the petitioners. Today, when the case was taken up, nobody has turned up to appear on behalf of petitioners. It appears that petitioners are no more interested in pursuing this matter.
02. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
04.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 15.04.2026
“Shamim Dar”