Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 728 (CHH)

PRAHLAD SINGH THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/1/2026 · 2026-01-06

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:829-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 1 of 2026 Prahlad Singh Thakur S/o Late Bahoran Singh Aged About 65 Years R/o Quarter No. 01/A, Russian Complex Sector 07, Police Station Sector - 06, Bhilai Nagar, Tehsil And District - Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Bhilai Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sher Singh Sethiya R/o Kuruspal, Post Kohka Development Block Bakavand, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh 3 - Lalit Kumar Baghel S/o Narsingh Baghel R/o 33/E, Risali Sector, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Rahil Arun Kochar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr.Priyank Rathi, Dy.G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 7.1.2026 1. Heard Mr. Rahil Arun Kocahr, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Priyank Rathi, learned Deputy Government Advocate BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.01.07 18:26:24 +0530 2 appearing for respondent No.1/State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the grievance of the petitioner from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and direct respondent No. 2 to comply with the order passed in Special Leave to Appeal (CRL) NO. 5047/2021 (Annexure P-5) arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03.09.2020 (Annexure P-2) in M.Cr.C. No. 4095/2020, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. No cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu