Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7279 (MAD)

Kalvikkarasi v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/8760/2026 · 2026-03-12

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 8760 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 8760 of 2026 1. Kalvikkarasi W/o. P.Manikandan, 90-C West street, Melur village, Tittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore district Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Cuddalore district, Cuddalore 2.the Revenue Divisional officer Virudhachalam, Cuddalore district 3.The Tahsildar Tittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore district Respondent(s) PRAYER Direction to the 3rd respondent to change the correction in FMB sketch in petitioner survey No. 126/1b2, 1C, 1D as per original records in pursuance of petitioner representation dated 23.12.2025 WP No. 8760 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Karuppaiyamooppanar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For Respondents ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to correct https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8760 of 2026 the FMB sketch for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. According to the petitioner, there is a discrepancy in the FMB sketch for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, which she claims that she is the owner. The petitioner had given a representation on 23.12.2025 along with supporting documents to the respondents, seeking for correction of the FMB sketch. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8760 of 2026 pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 23.12.2025, seeking for correction of the FMB sketch for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 12-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector Cuddalore district, Cuddalore 2.the Revenue Divisional officer Virudhachalam, Cuddalore district 3.The Tahsildar Tittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore district https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8760 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 8760 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis