CRL MP Nos. 3686, 3689 & 3695 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL MP Nos. 3686, 3689 & 3695 of 2026 in crl op.nos.2046, 2047 & 2048 of 2026 CRL MP No. 3686 of 2026 Hafiz Abdul Khyoom Tahir ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Represented by Inspector of Police Oomerabad Police Station, Tirupathur District - 635 808. 2. The State Represented by The Station in Charge Mahila UPS, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh ..Respondent(s) CRL MP No. 3686 of 2026 Safiya Feroze .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State Represented by Inspector of Police Oomerabad Police Station, Tirupathur District - 635 808. 2.The State Represented by The Station in Charge Mahila UPS, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP Nos. 3686, 3689 & 3695 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 CRL MP No. 3695 of 2026 Mohammed Zia .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State Represented by Inspector of Police Oomerabad Police Station, Tirupathur District - 635 808. 2.The State Represented by The Station in Charge Mahila UPS, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh COMMON PRAYER: To extend the time granted in the order dated 30.01.2026 in crl op.nos.2046, 2047 & 2048 of 2026. CRL MP No. 3686, 3689 & 3695 of 2026 For For Petitioner(s): M/s.Meera Moganasundaram For M/s.Ahmad Associates For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana, for R1 Government Advocate (Crl.Side) COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed seeking extension of time to comply with the conditions imposed as per the order of this Court in Crl.O.P.Nos. 2046, 2047 & 2048 of 2026 dated 30.01.2026. 2.This Court has already granted intestate anticipatory bail, fixing a time for the petitioners to approach the concerned jurisdictional Court. Though the petitioners came forward, executed the sureties and availed the benefit for four https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP Nos. 3686, 3689 & 3695 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 weeks, they have not thereafter approached the concerned jurisdictional Court. Instead, they have approached this Court seeking further extension of time for complying with the conditions. It is further submitted that the petitioners are unwell and is observing fasting during Ramadan. Hence, these petitions seeking extension of time have been filed. 3. Considering the aforesaid facts since the petitioner already availed benefit of interim protection for four weeks, this Court is not inclined to extend the time for complying with the conditions imposed on the petitioners in Crl OP.Nos.2046, 2047 & 2048 of 2026 dated 30.01.2026. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. 27-02-2026 GBI https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP Nos. 3686, 3689 & 3695 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.RAJASEKAR, J. GBI To 1.The State Represented by Inspector of Police Oomerabad Police Station, Tirupathur District - 635 808. 2.The State Represented by The Station in Charge Mahila UPS, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRL MP No. 3686, 3689 & 3695 of 2026 in crl op.no.2046, 2047 & 2048 of 2026 27-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis