Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 72770 (MAD)

S.MANI v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

WP/7480/2026 · 2026-02-26

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 7480 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 7480 of 2026 1. S.Mani Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore North, Coimbatore District. 2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore District. 3.The Taluk Surveyor, Mettupalayam Taluk Coimbatore District. 4.R.Palanisamy, 5.R.Ramasamy, 6.R.Durai samy, Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents 2 and 3 to conduct survey in SF No.565 / 2A2 measuring 0.53.00 Hectares in Bellathi Villate, MettupalayamTaluk, Coimbatore District by considering the petitioners Online Application No.2025 /0123/12/008386 dated 27/05/2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Manoharan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For Respondent ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to conduct survey of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7480 of 2026 this writ petition based on the petitioner’s online application dated 27.05.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. According to the petitioner, despite there being no bar for the respondents 2 and 3 to survey the petitioner’s land, since the objections raised by the respondents 4 to 6 have been negatived by the respondents 1 and 2, the petitioner’s land has not been surveyed and demarcated till date. 3. Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 6, notice to the respondents 4 to 6 is dispensed with by this Court. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the second respondent surveys and demarcates the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition after issuing notice to the respondents 4 to 6 and after their objections if any. The petitioner claims that since the objections raised by the respondents 4 to 6 have been negatived by the proceedings of the respondents 1 and 2, there is no bar for the second respondent to survey the petitioner’s property. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- (a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7480 of 2026 neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. (b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs. 26-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore North, Coimbatore District. 2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore District. 3.The Taluk Surveyor, Mettupalayam Taluk Coimbatore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7480 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 7480 of 2026 26-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis