Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
08.04.2026 Court No.28 Item No.98 tbsr Reject CRM (A) 778 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola P.S. Case No.544 of 2025 dated 26.06.2025 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Charge sheet submitted under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. And In the matter of: Md Asadul Hoque @ Prince ….Petitioner. Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Suman Bhanja Mr. Golam Ahammed
…for the petitioner Mr. Bibashwan Bhattacharya Mr. Dattatreya Dutta
… for the State
Report filed on behalf of the State is taken on record.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that other than the statement of a co-accused, there is no other incriminating material available against the present petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that other than the statement of a co-accused, there are three criminal antecedents of the petitioner of the years 2014, 2020 and 2021, all under the provisions of the NDPS Act.
Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.
2
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)