Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7272 (AP)

RONGALI NARAYANA APPALA NAIDU v. S. SURESH KUMAR,IAS

CC/3216/2025 · 2026-08-19

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010585272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3216/2025 Between: 1. RONGALI NARAYANA APPALA NAIDU, S/O. LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O.F.NO.402, SARADA KUTEER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI HARENDRA PRASAD I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SRI KETHAN GARG I A S, COMMISSIONER, GRATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. SMT K PADMAVATHI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER - V-A, GRATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Court Act for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this honorable court in W.P.NO.18637 of 2025 Dt.23.07.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3216 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No. 18637 of 2025, dated 23.07.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 20.08.2026 KGM 73 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3216 of 2025 Date: 20.08.2026 KGM