Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7271 (ALL)

JAGNANDAN AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/34786/2026 · 2026-09-16

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34786 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that certain defects have crept in the writ petition. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with the liberty prayed above. September 17, 2026 GS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, Jaideep Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Jagnandan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM SONI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad