RAKHI SANJAY GUPTA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WP/4437/2026 · 2026-09-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7269 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7269 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 of 2 04-WP-4437.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4437 OF 2026 Rakhi Sanjay Gupta. … Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. … Respondents. __________ Mr.Shashikant P. Chaudhari with Ms.Snehal S. Chaudhari, Mr.Manojkumar Singh, Mr.Puneet Shukla, Mr.Gyanprakash Pal, Mr.Pranot Pawar, Ms.Sarita G. Pal i/b. Maharashtra Law Associates for the Petitioner. Ms.Supriya Kak, APP for the Respondent- State. Mr.Ramdas Patil, PI with Ms.Dipali Pawase,, PSI, Mr.Laxman Kambale, PSI and Mr.Somnath Aavhad, PSI present. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 7th September 2026.
PC :
1. This Petition is filed with the main prayer for the direction to the Senior Inspector of Police, RCF Police Station to register FIR on the basis of Petitioner’s complaint dated 21st August 2026. There are also other prayers.
2. The learned A.P.P., on instructions states that the RCF Police Station is going to register the FIR on the complaint dated 21st August 2026 submitted by the Petitioner. SKN
2 of 2 04-WP-4437.26
3. At this stage, this serves the purpose of the Petitioner. Therefore, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner is not pressing other prayers.
4. The statement made by the learned A.P.P. is recorded and accepted. All the necessary steps for investigation including preservation of CC TV footage shall be taken by the Police Officer of RCF Police Station in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid observation, Petition is disposed of.
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)