( 2026:JHHC:12311 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1712 of 2026 ------ Jainul Sheikh @ Jainul Sk @ Jainul Shekh, aged about 43 years, son of Abdul Hased, resident of village –Ishakpur, P.S. Pakur (M), P.O. –Irahaspur, District –Pakur (Jharkhand). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Mehta, Advocate : Mr. V.P. Pathak, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.04 Dated- 27.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pakur (T) P.S. Case No.104 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 949 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 356/382/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons snatched the bag of the informant containing Rs.45,000/-. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and without putting him on Test Identification Parade as mentioned in para -10 of the bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.10.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that though the petitioner was involved in two other cases earlier but in both the cases, he has been acquitted as mentioned in the supplementary affidavit dated 17.04.2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Pakur, in connection with Pakur (T) P.S. Case No.104 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 949 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 27.04.2026 Sonu/