HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14398 of 2022 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application u/s 528 BNSS has been filed to quash the to quash the Complaint Case No. 111 of 2022, under Section 392 IPC, Police Station- Bilsi, District- Budaun, pending in the court of Special Judge (Dacoity Effected Area)/Additional Sessions Judge, Budaun as well as summoning order dated 22.03.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge (Dacoity Effected Area)/Additional Sessions Judge, Budaun. 3. It is alleged that on 19.02.2022 at about 06:00 p.m. when the complainant was coming from Mirzapur by motorcycle UP 24 AR 2567 then accused persons standing near Sadhu Panna Lal Degree College and their face were covered. They pushed the motorcycle of the complainant and one of the accused person pointed a gun at the complainant and the other accused took Rs. 12,000/- and a gold ring then complainant make a noise then accused persons ran away from the spot. Suddenly the cover of the accused persons removed then the complainant recognized the accused persons. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that the present complaint has lodged with malicious intention only to harass the applicants. Learned Magistrate without considering the matter on facts, issued summons. The present complaint has lodged in counter as applicant no. 2 filed a complaint on 26.03.2021 being complaint case no. 276/2021. He next submits that applicant no. 2 was not present on the spot as he was admitted in hospital which is evident from the annexure-7 to the application, the discharge slip, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amir Khan, Satish Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Zareef Ahmad And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) issued by the hospital. He next submits that the statements recorded u/s 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. and contents of complaint discloses that no offence under the aforesaid section is made. Summoning by learned Magistrate and prosecution against the applicant is liable to be set aside. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the submission raised by applicant's counsel and submits that prima facie offence is made out against the applicants hence, applicants are not entitled for relief as prayed. 5. This Court vide order dated 08.08.2022 stayed the proceeding of the present case and issued notice to the opposite party no. 2. As per the office report dated 16.11.2022, notice issue to the opposite party no. 2 and served personally but no one appears on his behalf. 6. Since 2022, the present proceeding is pending before the Court and by various orders, impugned order has been extended. On perusal of contents of complaint, the allegation against the applicants is that they robbed the complainant when he was coming from Mirzapur by motorcycle. The statements recorded u/s 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. are supporting the contents of complaint. The statement of complainant recorded u/s 200 Cr.P.C. is quoted hereinbelow:- "नाम- जमालउद्दीन उफर् नन्हू पुत्र िरयासत उम्र 52 वषर्, पेशा -व्यापार, पता थाना व कस्बा- िबल्सी, बदायूँ ने सशपथ बयान िकया िक - लगभग 19.02.2022 को समय 06.00 बजे शाम नन्हू मै व मेरी पत्नी आयशा मोटर साइिकल यू०पी० 24 ए०आर०-2567 से ग्राम िमजार्पुर से अपने घर आ रहा था मै मोटर साइिकल से जैसे ही साधु पन्ना लाल िडग्री कॉलेज से कु छ दूर आया तभी अचानक मोटर साइिकल पल्सर काले रंग से दो व्यिक्त खड़े हुये मुँह पर अगोछा बांधे हुये िमले और मेरी मोटर साइिकल को धक्का मारकर िगरा दी मैं और मेरी पत्नी िगर गये तभी मुझ पर एक व्यिक्त ने तमंचा तान िदया और दूसरे व्यिक्त ने मेरी जेब से 12,000/- रूपये सोने की अंगूठी जरीफ वगैरा ने लूट ली मारपीट करते समय उन लोगो के मुँह में अगोछे हट गये मैने उन लोगो को पहचान िलया मेरी चीख पुकार पर राहगीर ताहीर हुसैन पुत्र वाहीद हुसैन आ गये। तभी मुिल्जमान सहसवान की ओर भाग गये मुिल्जमानो के मुँह से अगोछा हटने के बाद सबने पहचान िलया मुिल्जमानो के नाम जरीफ अहमद, इरफान, िनवासी शहबाजपुर थाना सहसवान के था मै इन्हें पहले से जानता था। मैने पुिलस थाने को तहरीर उसी िदन दी लेिकन पुिलस ने िरपोटर् दजर् नही की िदनांक 22.02.2022 को घटना के सम्बन्ध मे रिजस्टडर् डाक से प्रा०पत्र A482 No. 14398 of 2022 2 िदया था, लेिकन इसके बाद भी पुिलस ने कोई कायर्वाही नही की मजबूर होकर न्यायालय की शरण मे आया हूँ।" 6. The submission of the counsel for the applicant is that applicant was admitted in the hospital at the time of the incident and in support it he has filed admission slip with the application, cannot considered at this stage. The plea of alibi requires certain evidence for which trial court is appropriate forum. The Court is in view after examining the record find a prima face offence is made out against the applicant. 7. In view of the statements recorded u/s 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. and the allegations alleged in the complaint, prima facie, offence is made out against the applicants, therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the applicants in the present case. No interference is warranted at this stage. 8. In view of the above, in the light of judgment of the Apex Court in the matters of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, Manik B. Vs. Kadapala Sreyes Reddy and another, 2023 Live Law (SC) 642, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283, no ground for quashing the proceedings of the aforesaid case, is made out which may call for any interference by this Court in exercise of its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS as the same do not suffer from any illegality or infirmity. 9. The present application u/s 528 BNSS is hereby dismissed with the aforesaid observation. 10. However, if the applicants surrender before the concerned court within three weeks from today and applies for bail, their bail applications shall be decided expeditiously by the court concerned, in accordance with law. September 15, 2026 Nisha A482 No. 14398 of 2022 3 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- nisha kumari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad