Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7259 (UTT)

MS MATHURA DATT PANDEY AND SONS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMB/540/2024 · 2026-06-18

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010185872024 2026:UHC:5063-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 540 OF 2024 18TH JUNE, 2026 M/s Mathura Datt Pandey & Sons …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel Counsel for the respondents : Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State : Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: 1) It appears that in pursuance to the interim order the petitioner was permitted to carry out the work and Mr. S.S. Chauhan, counsel for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 states that 30% of the work has already been completed. Thus, according to him, the department does not intend to enforce the order under challenge and shall permit the petitioner to complete the work. 1 UKHC010185872024 2026:UHC:5063-DB 2) In view of the said statement, no further order is needed in the matter. 3) The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4) Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. ______________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J. _________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dt: 18TH JUNE, 2026 Negi 2 HIMANS HU NEGI Digitally signed by HIMANSHU NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=bb3b60774012c1ef1dae20d13 aaf116e73351fdaf6878326386908a7f90 d5757, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=75BD9D0FB7F4A80990F C51A722A6BC552D470EB4FD2F88DDF7 C18DB2A1524A4D, cn=HIMANSHU NEGI Date: 2026.06.19 16:03:53 +05'30'