- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12771 WP No. 556 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.556 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KARNATAKA GRAMEENA BANK TALAPADY BRANCH, NAJJATH COMPLEX, OPP. RTO CHECKPOST, N.H.17. TALAPADY, MANGALORE, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-575 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SRI. A.N.HARSHITH, S/O SRI A.NARAYANA NAIK. AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, MOBILE NO.9916617872 IFSC CODE PKGB0013438. EMAIL ID br3438@kgbk.in …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAY S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE RECOVERY OFFICER JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, MANGALURU SUB-DIVISION, MANGALURU-575 001. 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, KOTEKAR VYAVASAYA SEVA BANK Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12771 WP No. 556 of 2026 NIYAMITHA, BEERI, BEERI ROAD, KOTEKAR, MANGALURU - 575 022. PH.NO.08242280824. IFSC CODE CNRB0003059. 3. SMT. BUSHRA W/O MR. MOHAMMED, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.1-87, AMBLAMOGARU, TILAKNAGAR, MANGALURUTALUK AND DISTRICT - 575 017. 4. MR. MOHAMMED S/O MR.AHMED, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.1-87, AMBLAMOGARU, TILAKNAGAR, MANGALORE TALUK AND DISTRICT - 575 017. 5. MR. MOHAMMED NASIR, S/O MR.HYDER, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3-71 E, HAREKILA, ALADKA, NERALAKATTE, MANGALURU - 575 019. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12771 WP No. 556 of 2026 QUASH THE SALE NOTICE DATED 30.12.2025 ISSUED BY THE RECOVERY OFFICER, AND JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETY MANGALURU SUB-DIVISION, MANGALURU (R1) FIXING THE AUCTION DATE ON 12.01.2026 ANNEXURE -A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the sale notice dated 30.12.2025 issued by respondent No.1 produced at Annexure-A to the Writ Petition, without challenging the Award made by the competent authority. 2. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, this writ petition does not survive for consideration. 3. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed. 4. Pending applications if any, do not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14