AMZAD ALI AHMED AND ANR v. ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE AND ANR
CRP(IO)/276/2025 · 2026-06-02
Kalyan Rai Surana
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7251 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7251 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010154022025
2026:GAU-AS:7692
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/276/2025 AMZAD ALI AHMED AND ANR SON OF JOYNAL ABEDIN, R/O BILASIPARA TOWN, WARD NO 8, P.O.- HAKAMA, P.S.-BILASIPARA, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783348 2: ABDUL AZIZ SON OF JOYNAL ABEDIN R/O BILASIPARA TOWN WARD NO 8 P.O.-HAKAMA P.S.-BILASIPARA DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-78334 VERSUS ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE AND ANR SON OF LATE ASHATULLAH SK SK, R/O BILASIPARA TOWN, WARD NO 8, P.O.-HAKAMA, P.S.-BILASIPARA, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783348 2:SATYAM DAS SON OF LATE KALIPADA DAS R/O BILASIPARA TOWN WARD NO 8 P.O.-HAKAMA P.S.-BILASIPARA DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-78334 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N N UPADHYAYA, MR. B B KAKATI,MR. D K BAGCHI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B HUSSAIN (R-1),
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 03.06.2026 Mr. B.B. Kakaty, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received instructions and the matter has been compromised outside the Court. He has instructions not to press the matter.
2. Accordingly, the matter stands dismissed on withdrawal as prayed for.
3. Interim order stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant