IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.103 of 2026 Decided on: 26th February, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Geetanjali …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of office order dated 02.01.2026 and submits that judgment in question has been complied with by deciding the case of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the respondents have passed the consideration order, however, the petitioner has grievance to the same. He, therefore, submits that present proceedings be closed, but liberty be reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 her surviving grievances including against office order dated 02.01.2026. Granting such liberty, the present execution petition is disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua February 26, 2026 Judge Mukesh