Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 725 (JHR)

RAJENDRA SAW @ RAJENDRA KUMAR SAW v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./332/2026 · 2026-02-24

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5873 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 332 of 2026 --------- Rajendra Saw @ Rajendra Kumar Saw, Age about 36 years, S/o-Dineshwar Saw, R/o Village Gangpur, P.O. Barkipunnu, P.S. Mahuatand, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-24.02.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 272, 274, 275, 3(5) of B.N.S.2023 and 47 (a) Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent and has committed no offence whatsoever as alleged in the F.I.R., and there are no specific allegations made against the petitioner in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion and due to previous enmity. He further submits that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the seized vehicles, and nothing has been recovered either from the possession of the petitioner or from his house. He lastly submits that the petitioner is in custody since 31.10.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner as well as and the period of custody, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C. at Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Mahuatand P.S.Case No. 21 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 24.02.2026 Amardeep/- Uploaded 27.02.2026